|
|
|
|
01.04.2008 - Goanda?... |
|
|
Rain dampens tourist spirts in Canacona
CANACONA, MARCH 24 – They had expected to savour Goa’s
famed sand, sea and sun, but ended up with sand, sea and showers.
Unseasonal
rains lashing Goa since Friday have played havoc on those tourists
staying in temporary beach-huts at Agonda, Palolem, Patnem and Colomb
beaches in Canacona taluka.
Many of these tourists are forced to
look for alternate arrangements, as it has become virtually impossible
to occupy the rain-drenched beach huts.
As such, rent-out rooms
along the village interiors have suddenly been in high demand, as
salvage operations of beach-huts are in full swing.
Owners of beach
shacks and other temporary erected tourist establishments like kiosks
and gaddas had a tough time saving their goods, while rains continued
to hit the taluka.
While they were trying to salvage their
belongings, Tourist Police made their presence at Palolem beach to
enforce the court strictures on beach beds, beach-umbrellas, which have
been blocking public access to the beach.
The weekly Saturday’s
bazaar at Chaudi was also deserted, with only a few turning up to
purchase provisions, as the rains have provided little or no respite
since Friday.
Canacona locals against encroachment survey
CANACONA,
MARCH 28 – Strong resentment is brewing among coastal residents of
Canacona, after authorities have threatened to demolish their
structures, which violate the CRZ rules.
Speaking to Herald, some
affected residents have demanded that authorities should scrap the
recent survey conducted to identify the encroachments.
“Instead,
they should conduct a common survey along the line of the one conducted
under the provisions of Goa Land Revenue Code in 1972-73. Otherwise,
locals who have their residential houses even before February 1991 will
be badly affected and will displaced in their own land,” a resident
told Herald.
It is pointed out that the survey conducted under
Revenue code in 1972-73 was promulgated in 1976. Between 1976 and 1991,
a number of structures and extensions were built, but were not
reflected on any survey or records of local bodies. The CRZ
notification came into force on February 19, 1991.
“People having
mundkarial order, Sale Deed and House Tax receipts may show their
existence of their houses prior to 1991. Besides, there may not be
records like permissions/licenses of structures shown on survey plan,
or of extensions carried out prior to 1991,” remarked Canacona former
Deputy Chairperson Dayanand Pagui.
“Hence, these too can be termed
as structure after 1991 and taken up for demolitions, which may come
true of many hutments of toddy-tappers, fisherfolks in the coastal
areas,” he added.
Incidentally, the present survey prepared by the
Directorate of Settlement and Land Records was done in reference to
existing survey plans prepared and promulgated under Land Revenue Code
or on the basis of permissions/licenses issued by local bodies.
“But
what about constructions and extensions done prior to 1991, but not
assessed for house Tax,” asked former deputy sarpanch of the erstwhile
Palolem-Nagarcem panchayat Shantaji Naik Gaonkar.
Residents who
received notices of the Canacona Municipal Council (CMC) regarding
their encroachments have been called to appear in person on April 2
with documents of their structures to prove their existence before
February 1991.
“I intend to complete the process within the 60-day
deadline provided by the court. I’ll hear the parties from April 2
onwards and will pass orders based on documents produced by the
parties,” CMC Chief Officer Agnelo Fernandes told Herald.
According
to Mr Fernandes, the documents to ascertain the legality of the
structures include permissions from the panchayat, TCP/PDA, health
centre or electricity department.
Asks Shantaji Naik Gaonkar: “If
these documents existed with these people, their structures would have
been legal in the original survey plan irrespective of the year of
constructions. But since there was no survey from 1976 to 1991, almost
all the houses will be termed as illegal.”
Voicing similar views,
Dayanand Pagui claimed that identifying all houses as illegal would be
a catastrophe. “People will be displaced from their homes, prompting
law and order problem for the authorities,” he said.
|
|
01.04.2008 - Goanda?... |
|
|
|